MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2363373722

The “Green Energy Space” of the Free Trade Rules:From the Perspective of Canada Renewable Energy Generator Dispute

2014· article· en· W2363373722 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Le Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Trade Organization Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubsidyRenewable energyGovernment (linguistics)Feed-in tariffSpace (punctuation)Distortion (music)BusinessEnergy subsidiesEconomicsGenerator (circuit theory)Industrial organizationCommerceMarket economyEnergy policyTelecommunicationsEngineeringElectrical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Canada renewable energy generator dispute,the Appellate Body opined that government's financial contributions that assist the creation of the renewable energy market are not a subsidy,but if government's invention distorts the market,then it may become a subsidy. The differentiation of market creation and market distortion by Appellate Body maintains members' policy space on renewable energy,and leaves uncertainty as well. Revision of SCM rules will be needed for the extension of green space under the WTO through restoration of non-actionable subsidy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Southwest University of Political Science and LawSame topicWorld Trade Organization LawFrench-language works237,207