MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2363416883

Implementing the equipment occupation and use system with compensation,raising the equipment investment results

2006· article· en· W2363416883 on OpenAlex
Yang Weixi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Technology and Management · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Work Dynamics
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompensation (psychology)Investment (military)LeverWork (physics)IdleEngineeringPromotion (chess)Management systemRaising (metalworking)Operations managementBusinessComputer scienceMechanical engineeringLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article mainly discussed on reforming the equipment management of universities,put forward the use of the economical method,implemented the thoughts of reforming the equipment occupation and use system.In this article,it also makes the introduction of the implementation of equipment occupied and used with compensation,and analyzes the malpractice which exists in the equipment management system befor the reforming of the system.It dots not pay much attention to the investment result of the equipment and the cost of running school.After the implementation of the equipment system with compensation,making use of economic lever to strengthen the equipment management.The practice proves,the equipment utilization benefit of our school obtained a great promotion,the equipment occupation units began to pay attention to the maintenance work and the regulation of the idle equipment,and to stress on making the best use of equipment work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it