MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2363416883

Implementing the equipment occupation and use system with compensation,raising the equipment investment results

2006· article· en· W2363416883 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Weixi

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Technology and Management · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Work Dynamics
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompensation (psychology)Investment (military)LeverWork (physics)IdleEngineeringPromotion (chess)Management systemRaising (metalworking)Operations managementBusinessComputer scienceMechanical engineeringLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article mainly discussed on reforming the equipment management of universities,put forward the use of the economical method,implemented the thoughts of reforming the equipment occupation and use system.In this article,it also makes the introduction of the implementation of equipment occupied and used with compensation,and analyzes the malpractice which exists in the equipment management system befor the reforming of the system.It dots not pay much attention to the investment result of the equipment and the cost of running school.After the implementation of the equipment system with compensation,making use of economic lever to strengthen the equipment management.The practice proves,the equipment utilization benefit of our school obtained a great promotion,the equipment occupation units began to pay attention to the maintenance work and the regulation of the idle equipment,and to stress on making the best use of equipment work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental Technology and ManagementSame topicEducation and Work DynamicsFrench-language works237,207