Response of Kobresia tibetica and Kobresia humilis population spatial pattern to soil moisture
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heterogeneity of plant population response to soil moisture is the environmental basis of their pattern's formation and evolution. According to the pattern of soil water decreasing gradually from the wetland center to the edge,we set up five sampling plots to study the spatial distribution and spatial association of Kobresia tibetica and K. humilis under different soil moistures in north Qilian Mountain by using the point pattern analysis. The results showed that with the decrease of alpine wetland moisture content,the coverage,plant height and aboveground biomass of K. tibetica population were continuously increased,while the main biological features of K. humilis increased firstly then reduced. The distribution pattern of K. tibetica was clumped—regular—clumped and that of K. humilis gradually shifted from aggregation to regularity at small scale.Along with the decrease of soil moisture,the spatial association between K. tibetica and K. humilis population at small scale was positively correlated,then changed into no significant correlation and negative correlation finally. In the alpine wetland,the main biological features and spatial pattern of K. tibetica and K. humilis populations showed regular changes,which reflected the adaptability of the two species in response to habitat heterogeneity under different soil moistures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it