MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2363894014

Visual Simulation of Aircraft Brake System Based on MATLAB MFC and Vega

2010· article· en· W2363894014 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jing Xue

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSimulation and Modeling Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVegaMATLABComputer scienceSkid (aerodynamics)BrakeBraking systemAutomotive engineeringProcess (computing)SimulationEngineeringOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using Multigen Creator to establish the three-dimensional models of aircraft and airfield, then the scene is managed by using Vega. The technology of visual simulation is applied into aircraft anti-skid braking system. The developing tool MFC is applied to the data transmission between MATLAB and Vega in order to realize the visual effects during the process of aircraft braking. This simulation system makes the process of aircraft anti-skid braking visually and plays an important role on researching the influencing factors of braking process and the braking control method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocomputer applicationsSame topicSimulation and Modeling ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207