MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2364035545

SYNTHESIS,MAGNETIC AND TRANSPORT PROPERTIES OF Pr_(0.75)Na_(0.25)Mn_(1-x)Fe_xO_3(0.0≤x≤0.3)

2010· article· en· W2364035545 on OpenAlexaff
Wang Zai-shan

Bibliographic record

VenueDiwen wuli xuebao · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceElectrical resistivity and conductivityDopingCrystalliteMagnetizationSinteringDopantAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Phase (matter)ManganeseAtmospheric temperature rangeMagnetic fieldMetallurgyThermodynamicsChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The single-phase polycrystalline perovskites Pr0.75Na0.25Mn1-xFexO3 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.30) were prepared for the first time by a sol-gel technique,which offers shorter sintering time and lower temperature to avoid the volatilization of Na and the precipitation of manganese oxide. As a result,the maximum sodium solubility in Pr1-xNaxMnO3 was improved from 0.19 as the literature report to 0.25,and the degree of single-phase was significantly improved. The temperature dependence of magnetization and resistivity of the samples series exhibits that long-range CO is disrupted even for 2% Fe doping level. The magnetization increases and resistivity decreases with increasing Fe doping for x≤0.05,and then both of them vary to opposite tendency with further increasing Fe doping. The effects of Fe doping on Pr0.75Na0.25Mn1-xFexO3 compounds can be analyzed from the competition of two different aspects,namely the geometric effect (size of the dopant) and electronic configurations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiwen wuli xuebaoSame topicMagnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materialsFrench-language works237,207