MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2364039896

Calculation of nonlinear displacement of overhead pipeline system

2001· article· en· W2364039896 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil, Finite Element Methods
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverhead (engineering)Pipeline (software)Nonlinear systemComputationDisplacement (psychology)Spring (device)Computer scienceScale (ratio)Pipeline transportMathematical optimizationApplied mathematicsEngineeringStructural engineeringAlgorithmMathematicsMechanical engineeringPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the design of large scale overhead pipeline systems transporting high temperature gas,calculation of the displacement and stress induced by heat is a very important aspect.A new method named varied spring coefficient iteration method is introduced,which is very effective in solving the nonlinear bracket friction problem.AOPAP program is a special software to do nonlinear structure analysis of overhead pipeline systems.AOPAP program uses the varied spring coefficient iteration method.Computation results of the displacement of an overhead pipeline are got,and they are compared with measured values.The comparison testifies that varied spring coefficient iteration method is very effective and AOPAP program is very practical.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil, Finite Element MethodsFrench-language works237,207