Lead isotopic composition of volcanic rocks in the Qoltag tectonic belt,East Tianshan,and its significance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reports the lead isotopic composition of volcanic rocks of the Qi'eshan Group and Yamansu Formation in the Qoltag ore belt and plagiogranite porphyry and copper ore of the Tuwu copper deposit and further discusses the tectonic evolution of this ore belt.The lead isotopic composition of volcanic rocks of the Qi'eshan Group plots to the right of the geochron line,and has more radiogenic lead than the northern hemisphere reference line(NHRL),indicating the weak enrichment character.The lead composition of plagiogranite porphyry and copper ore of the Tuwu ore deposit lies in the field of the Qi'eshan Group and has a similar character.The Yamansu Formation has more radiogenic lead than the Qi'eshan Group and also shows the weak enrichment character.In the plumbotectonics diagram,the Qi'eshan Group follows the mantle evolution curve,but the Yamansu Formation plots near the orogenic evolution line,indicating more continental crust involvement.The lead isotope composition of the Yamansu Formation samples shows the features of the linear array and falls between the Qi'eshan Group and Central Tianshan granites,indicating the trend of mixing of the two end-members(Qi'eshan Group and Central Tianshan granites).With enhancing fluid metasomatism,the Qi'eshan Group and Yamansu Formation become more and more depleted in radiogenic lead,suggesting that the metasomatic agent was mainly derived from altered oceanic crust,without the involvement of pelitic sediments.The presence of more radiogenic lead in the Yamansu Formation than in the Qi'eshan Group is mainly because its continental crustal basement was thicker so that it was subjected to stronger contamination with continental crust.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".