MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2364180842

Numerical Studies on Movement Performance of Impact Pendulum

2005· article· en· W2364180842 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Systems and Laser Technology
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaser propulsionImpulse (physics)PendulumControl theory (sociology)Displacement (psychology)Pulse (music)LaserPropulsionEngineeringMathematicsPhysicsComputer scienceClassical mechanicsAerospace engineeringMechanical engineeringElectrically powered spacecraft propulsionVoltageOpticsControl (management)PsychologyElectrical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study on movement performance of impact pendulum is of great value to the analysis of the impulse coupling process of laser propulsion. Based on the angular displacement of impact pendulum by experiment measure and movement differential equation under different initiative condition, calculating precision of arithmetical solution is analyzed, rational resistance model is built up and the movement performance of impact pendulum under instantaneous action of laser pulse is described. The result shows that numerical studies primly represent the experimental process of impact pendulum movement and validate the performance that the action of laser pulse to lightcraft is completed instantaneously.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Systems and Laser TechnologyFrench-language works237,207