MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2364230501

Research on Perceptual-control-based Design for User Interface

2010· article· en· W2364230501 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicUsability and User Interface Design
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUsabilityComputer scienceHuman–computer interactionUSablePerceptionTask (project management)User interfaceUser interface designControl (management)User experience designInterface (matter)MultimediaArtificial intelligenceSystems engineeringEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the soaring development of pervasive computing environment,an increasing number of folks need to conduct tasks that used to be completed with the help of business agents in the past.This makes traditional interactive design techniques of business orientation difficult to meet the common users' usability requirements for the environment.In this paper,we present a design technique for user interfaces based on the perceptual control theory.It enables to provide usable user interfaces,which are easy to learn,to understand and to manipulate for the common users.For the purpose of satisfying the usability requirements in the pervasive computing environment,this design technique introduces a technique of task analysis in accordance with perceptual control theory and a process of participatory design,to help the users making interaction at the task level instead of at the business level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score0.836

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUsability and User Interface DesignFrench-language works237,207