MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2364278908 · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.09.065

Topical minocycline foam for moderate to severe acne vulgaris: Phase 2 randomized double-blind, vehicle-controlled study results

2016· letter· en· W2364278908 on OpenAlexaff
Avner Shemer, Joseph Shiri, Jacob Mashiah, Renata Farhi, Aditya K. Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2016
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
Canadian institutionsMediprobe Research (Canada)University of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinocyclineMedicineAcneDoxycyclineDermatologyTolerabilityRandomized controlled trialAdverse effectInternal medicineAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: Acne vulgaris (AV) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects 80% to 90% of persons by the age of 21.1 Oral antibiotics, such as tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline, have been a mainstay of treatment for moderate-to-severe AV; however, their systemic side effects (including uncommon but severe minocycline-induced autoimmune reactions such as drug-induced lupus) warrant the need for alternative treatments.1-3 FMX-101, a new topical foam formulation of minocycline, was evaluated in a Phase 2, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, dose-finding study conducted in Tel-Aviv and Netanya, Israel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.005
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Academy of DermatologySame topicAcne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsFrench-language works237,207