MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2364300186

Video steganalysis method based on spatial-time redundancy of statistics invisibility

2012· article· en· W2364300186 on OpenAlexaff
Haibin Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueJisuanji yingyong yanjiu · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsThe Alberta Paraplegic Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSteganalysisComputer scienceSteganographyArtificial intelligenceRedundancy (engineering)Support vector machineDiscrete cosine transformPattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionEmbeddingImage (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The video steganography of the spread spectrum embedding and MSU are the two typical steganographic method,which can be resistant against compression and other attacks,in order to obtain the effective detection of the embedded secret information.According to the video spatial-time redundancy,this paper proposed a real-time video steganalysis method.Used a size of L+1 sliding window to obtain an estimate of the video frames,and extracted the corresponding DCT and Markov features,and used neural networks,support vector machines and other classification methods for video steganalysis.The results show that,according to the DCT and Markov features,the correct detection rate is higher.The support vector machines and time and spatial redundancy,etc can be used in the video steganalysis,which have great prospects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJisuanji yingyong yanjiuSame topicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesFrench-language works237,207