MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2364513852

Herbal Slim Capsule for Weight Loss Prospective Study

2010· article· en· W2364513852 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lei Nian-dong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Practical Traditional Chinese Internal Medicine · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare and Venom Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaistlineWeight lossMedicineWaistCapsuleBody mass indexBody weightAnimal scienceInternal medicineObesity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Objective]An assessment on an efficacy of herbal slim capsule for weight loss in toronto. [Methods]By mean of self — paired analysis,weights,body mass index ( BMI) and waist's changes were compared respectively before and after weight loss.[Results]After observers were make self - paired comparison, theirs weight was reduced 1.73~4.54Kg(P 0.01) respectively.majority were close in 1.82~2.27Kg, medium was 1.59kg;BMI was lowered 0.33~1.73(P 0.01 ) ;the waistline was reduced 2.54 ~ 12.7cm. there was no relationship between waisdine reduce and weight loss ( rs =0.45,P 0.05 ).[Conclusion]The slim capsule is more idealist because its period is only 2 weeks and work well.meanwhile,it is worth of analysis and further study on weight loss,bmi and relation of waistline versus weight loss in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Practical Traditional Chinese Internal MedicineSame topicHealthcare and Venom ResearchFrench-language works237,207