The Index of Well-Being and Its Influential Factors among Family Members of Home-Care Elders
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To explore the index of well-being and its influential factors among family members of home-care elders with the hope to provide basis for effective intervention programs.Methods Cluster sampling method was employed and 150 family members of home-care elderly from one certain community were investigated with self-designed questionnaire and the MUNSH(Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness).Single factor analysis was used to analyze the data.Results The mean index of well-being of these 150 family members was(30.8±6.7).It was positively correlated with friends-making,phone calls,activities,and communication with family members(P0.05)while negatively correlated with family income bathing ability,sleeping quality,diet ability and defecation ability(P0.05).Conclusion The index of well-being among family members of home-care elders is relatively low,which can be enhanced through efforts on home-care support by the government as well as improvement of the physical and mental conditions of the elderly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it