Classification of Container Seedlings Growing with Light Media for Erythrophleum fordii Oliv.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Classification standard of container seedlings growing with light media for Erythrophleum fordii Oliv. was studied by principal components and step-by-step cluster analysis methods,and its effect was tested by a planting trial. The results showed that the seedlings could be divided into three grades,seedlings with H≥23 cm and D≥0.41 cm belong to the first grade,23 cmH≥19 cm and 0.41 cmD≥0.36 cm to second grade,and H19 cm and D0.36 cm to the third grade.This was then confirmed by the planting trial. There was no significant difference between seedlings of the first and second grade in survival rate (more than 90%) while significant different (p0.05) in height and diameter growth when one year old,and the survival rate (below 60%) and seedling growth of the third grade were remarkably lower than those of the first and second grades. It could thus be concluded that the classification standard was suitable for light media container seedlings of this species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".