Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
According to the 9-lumped kinetic model and the total kinetic model as well as the mechanism of the F-T synthesis wax hydrocracking process,a 5-lumped kinetic model was established.On the basis of the concept of isomerization factor,the experimental results combined with isomerization reaction simulation and the introduction of cracking probability function,the original 9-lumped kinetic model cracking assumption was improved.Cracking probability function made the model more close to the actual hydrocracking process.There were seven reactions in the 5-lumped reaction kinetic model.Two kinds of kinetic models were compared by using the experimental results over the catalyst consisting of platinum(0.6%,mass)supported on amorphous silica alumina modified with H-β.The average relative error between the 5-lumped kinetic model calculations and experimental values was 3.95%.When conversion was higher than 90%,average relative error was below 0.8%.From the comparison,product selectivity could be well predicted by the 5-lumped model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it