MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2364781414

Effect of alloy powder on microstructures and mechanical properties of the K640 brazed joints

2008· article· en· W2364781414 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectric Welding Machine · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Temperature Alloys and Creep
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrazingEutectic systemMaterials scienceJoint (building)MicrostructureAlloyMetallurgyBase metalNeckingFracture (geology)Stress (linguistics)Composite materialWeldingStructural engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cast cobalt-based high temperature alloy,named K640,was brazed by conventional brazing and wide-gap brazing respectively.The micpostructures of the joints were observed and analyzed by means of SEM and EDX.The results showed that obvious composition segregation occured in the capillary joint,and lots of compounds as well as low-melting eutectic phases accumulated in the central part of the joint.Whereas,the microstructure of the joint was remarkably improved with the addition of alloy powder,in particular,the amount of compounds and low-melting eutectics decreased sharply.This is favorable to the improvement of the joint strength.However,the formation of a few small holes in the brazing seam would unavoidablely weaken the joint.The average stress-rupture life of the conventional brazed joints was 19h48min,and fracture occurred at the brazing seam with some necking.On the other hand, the average stress-rupture life of the wide-gap brazed joints came up to 21 h 43 min,and in the case the fracture occurred at the base metal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it