MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2364806101

A fractal study on the scale structure of the urban system in Jilin Province

2014· article· en· W2364806101 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Northeast Normal University · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Quality and Pollution
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFractalZipf's lawFractal dimensionScale (ratio)Fractal dimension on networksFractal analysisMathematicsStatistical physicsGeographyCartographyMathematical analysisStatisticsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper commences with the application of the fractal theory on study of urban systems. Based on the fractal dimension of Hausdorff,the fractal dimension of the scale structure was calculated with Zipf rule in Jilin Province.It was showed that this region's urban systems have the fractal properties.And it also showed that fractal theory fits the calculation and analysis on the scale structure of urban system in Jilin Province.According to the fractal properties,the paper analyzed the distribution characteristic and existent problems of the scale structure of urban system.On the basis of calculating and analyzing the scale structure of urban system with fractal theory,the paper puts forward some suggestions of the urban systems of the Jilin Province.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it