MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2364902734 · doi:10.1039/9781849730822-00319

Formation, Occurrence, Significance, and Analysis of Organoselenium and Organotellurium Compounds in the Environment

2010· review· en· W2364902734 on OpenAlexaff
Dirk Wallschläger, Jörg Feldmann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSelenium in Biological Systems
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeleniumBioaccumulationEnvironmental chemistryTrophic levelAbiotic componentFood chainTRACE (psycholinguistics)BiologyEcologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Among all environmentally-relevant trace elements, selenium has one of the most diverse organic chemistries. It is also one of the few trace elements that may biomagnify in food chains under certain conditions. Yet, the exact chemical forms of selenium involved in the uptake into organisms and transfer to higher trophic levels, as well as the biochemical mechanisms that lead to their subsequent metabolism in organisms, are still not well understood. This is in part due to the analytical challenges associated with measuring the myriad of discrete Se species occurring in organisms. While there are generalized concepts of selenium metabolism, there is a lack of conclusive analytical evidence supporting the existence of many postulated intermediates. Likewise, there is a disconnect between the major selenium species encountered in abiotic compartments (waters, soils, and sediment), and those found in organisms, which renders the qualitative and quantitative description of the bioaccumulation process uncertain. Here, we summarize the knowledge on important selenium and tellurium species in all environmental compartments, and identify gaps and uncertainties in the existing body of knowledge, with emphasis on problems associated with past and current analytical methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSelenium in Biological SystemsFrench-language works237,207