Marginalité sociale, Etat-Providence, action communautaire : l'exemple de Vancouver (Social marginality, the Welfare State, community action : the case of Vancouver)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé. - Cet article examine les relations entre l'espace urbain, les politiques sociales et la condition des populations marginalisées dans le quartier du Downtown Eastside à Vancouver, au Canada. La conjonction entre les dynamiques de l'espace urbain, les transformations des politiques sociales (le glissement vers un workfare) et les mutations des formes d'exclusion sociale (toxicomanie) renforcent la marginalisation d'une partie de la population. Pourtant, les populations en dehors de l'emploi développent des compétences, qui ne leur permettent toutefois pas de se présenter sur le marché du travail. L'action communautaire dans différents secteurs (logement, santé, développement économique) n'est pas en mesure aujourd'hui de répondre aux besoins en raison d'un manque de volonté politique pour résoudre ces questions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".