MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2364991577

Anne of Green Gables from the Perspective of Eco-feminism

2010· article· en· W2364991577 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Guangxi Normal University · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe ImaginaryIdeologyHappinessFeminismPerspective (graphical)Ideal (ethics)SociologyGender studiesEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophyLawArtPolitical sciencePsychoanalysisEpistemologyPsychologyPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ann of Green Gables is a masterpiece by Canadian authoress L.M.Montgomery.The eleven-year-old orphan,Anne,tries to break the fetters of the patriarchal society in her imagination.In her imaginary world,she has got happiness,self-esteem and hope for the future never found in the real world.Finally,along with her return to nature,sincere fellowship with others,and hard struggle she gets out of her imaginary world,recaptures her self-awareness,and grows up to be a warm-hearted and intelligent young women. Her growth indicates the authoress' eco-feminist ideology which is beyond her age — men share with nature and among themselves an organic unity which cannot be separated.Only with equal coexistence between human and nature and mutual loves among human beings can an ideal and harmonious world be constructed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it