MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2365087985

Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Evaluation of Foreign Tourists to China's Quality of Tourism Service

2009· article· en· W2365087985 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiaowei Liao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Gansu Lianhe University · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEvaluation Methods in Various Fields
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaTourismService qualityBusinessService (business)Quality (philosophy)GeographyOrder (exchange)Cluster (spacecraft)Multivariate analysisRegional scienceMarketingEconomic growthEconomicsStatisticsFinanceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sustainable development of tourism largely depends on quality of tourism service.In this paper,using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation,the evaluation of overseas tourists to China's quality of tourism service is analyzed quantitatively.The results are in the order of from high to low——Japan,Canada,the United States,Australia,Sweden,United Kingdom,Germany,the Netherlands,France,Italy,Spain and South Korea.Then the above twelve countries are divided into four categories,using cluster analysis.All the results show that there are still outstanding differences among tourists from different countries on China's evaluation of the quality of tourism service.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Gansu Lianhe UniversitySame topicEvaluation Methods in Various FieldsFrench-language works237,207