MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2365111205

Drawing Inspiration from Multiple International Cooperation of Kazakhstan's Nuclear Energy

2010· article· en· W2365111205 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNatural Resource Economics of China · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy Security and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaNuclear powerInternational tradeBusinessPromotion (chess)Nuclear technologyGovernment (linguistics)EconomyPolitical scienceEconomicsPoliticsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The title of Uranium Power has brought huge economic benefits to Kazakhstan;and international cooperation in nuclear energy has become one of the directions of economic development of Kazakhstan.Currently,Kazakhstan mainly conducted nuclear cooperation with seven countries,such as Japan,Korea,France,Canada,India,Russia and China.Nuclear energy cooperation with Kazakhstan is the selection for China to create a secure channel of nuclear energy.This paper focuses on the strategies which should be adopted by China,these are:exchanging the controlled transfer of nuclear technology for uranium resources,diversifying the interests of nuclear cooperation parties,achieving various forms of nuclear cooperation,quoting the interactive mode of cooperation and promotion of government + market to ensure China's interests in the fi eld of nuclear energy in Kazakhstan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it