MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2365137578

Model of Intensive Care Nursing Training and Continuing Education in Toronto and Its Inspirations

2014· article· en· W2365137578 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Deng Fei-fe

Bibliographic record

VenueNanfang huli xuebao · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContinuing educationCurriculumMedicineChinaTraining (meteorology)Medical educationNursingIntensive care unitUnit (ring theory)Nurse educationPedagogyPsychologyMathematics educationIntensive care medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduced the model of continuing education of Intensive Care Unit(ICU) nurses in Toronto, including curriculum contents, arrangement of theory and practice teaching, forms and methods of curriculum teaching, clinical practice in the hospitals and evaluation methods of the curriculum.At the same time it suggested some measures for continuing education for ICU nurses in China, which included updating education idea, improving course contents and teaching methods, establishing a standard and sound training evaluation system and exploring stratified education training pattern. It is meaningful and helpful to establish an effective and reasonable model of ICU continuing education in China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanfang huli xuebaoSame topicHigher Education Learning PracticesFrench-language works237,207