To analyze reasons of discarding as useless of α-Se direct conversion digital flat panel detector
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To analyze the reasons of discarding as useless of α-Se direct conversion digital flat panel detector (α-Se FPD). Methods (1) E-COM DR-2000CTM chest system, with high frequency X-ray machine made by CPI company of Canada, the X-ray tube made by VARIAN company of America and Direct Ray-1000 α-Se FPD made by DRC company of America. (2) 50 cases were collected rondomizedly, each had 4 pieces of chest image and were analyzed by two experienced radiologists and two technicians. Results After about 14 months with 30,000 times exposure efficacious, some damage lines and points appeared in the detector. After about 34 months with 70,000 times exposure efficacious, a damage region (area is 6.7in*0.95in ) existed, this reduced the images' quality and at the end the detector was discarded as useless. Conclusion The α-Se FPD needs maintenance and monitoring working circumstance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".