Factors influencing foster placement outcomes for children in British Columbia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An investigation of factors thought to contribute to the breakdown of foster homes for children in British Columbia was completed in this study. Data was collected from 22 foster parents across the province; all members of the British Columbia Federation of Foster Parents. Through the use of survey questionnaires, foster parents were asked to respond to questions regarding their experiences with a foster child aged 6 to 12 years formerly in their care. Data was collected to indicate the presence of difficult child behaviour, supportive services available to foster parents and parental attributions towards care giving outcomes. Family systems theory and social cognition theory provided a theoretical background to this research through the discussion of family dynamics and parental attributions. Variables under study in this project have been found in previous research to affect foster placement stability. Results revealed that verbally aggressive behaviour by children may affect placement stability while physical aggression and delinquent behaviour do not. Results also indicated that foster parent attributions regarding children in their care may relate to foster placement outcomes. Support from the foster care system appeared to have limited impact on the success of placement. However, foster parents reported an overall lack of available support. Throughout this study, the need for further research into foster placement outcomes is highlighted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".