MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2365348745

The Enlightenment of Canadian Evidence Law to Our Correlative Legislation

2006· article· en· W2365348745 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lin An-mi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Education and Practice Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationLawLegislatureEnlightenmentPolitical scienceHavenCommon lawPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Evidence is not only the key to prove the facts but also the emphasis of procedure.Developed countries as Canada have enacted evidence law and perfected evidence system.However,we emphasize the entity and despise the procedure in the history,and then we haven't enacted an independent evidence law.With the social development,we should consider adequately our legislative condition and traditional usage,keep an eye to the impact from the development of science and technology on making evidence law,use for reference from the legislative experience of developed countries such as Canada,and then enact an independent evidence law as soon as possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.045
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.100
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0450.100
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0210.034
Scholarly communication0.0160.008
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0130.027
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law→Same topicLegal Education and Practice Innovations→French-language works237,207→