MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2365401983

Study on peptide vaccine Cop-I induces the specific immune response in MS patients

2000· article· en· W2365401983 on OpenAlexaff
Dong Zhang, Qin Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueZhongguo mianyixue zazhi · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemCD8ImmunologyT cellCytokineCytotoxic T cellBiologyMedicineMolecular biologyIn vitroBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective:To study on the immune response of patients with MS received Cop I for one year.Methods:The frequency of Cop I/MBP reactive T cell line was detemined by split well microtitre method.The cytokine profile of these T cells was quantitatively analyzed by ELISA.The phenotype of these T cell lines was assessed by immunofluroscence technique.Results:In 15 MS patients and 9 other neurologic diseases(OND)patients who received the Cop I for one year,the mean frequency of Cop I/MBP specific T cell lines was 84 0% and 5.4% respectively.The cytokine profile of Cop I specific T cell lines demonstrated the Th2 cytokines like IL 5 and IL 13.Further,all of the MBP/Cop I specific T cell lines were CD3 positive Cop I,most of them expressed CD8 and some of them were CD3/CD56 double positive cells called NKT,which only kill the Glioma cells but leave the K562 alive.Conclusion:These results indicate that Cop I can induce the specific immune response involved in mainly by CD8 and NKT cells.Meanwhile Cop I can upregulate Th2 cell in the T cell immune repertorie in the Cop I treating MS patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhongguo mianyixue zazhi→Same topicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research→French-language works237,207→