Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the feasibility and sensitivity of Montreal cognitive assessment( MoCA) and mini-mental state examination( MMSE) in the evaluation of mild cognitive impairment( MCI) in patients with chronic alcoholism( CA). Methods: The cognitive function of 60 patients with CA( CA group) and 30 healthy people( control group) were evaluated by MoCA and MMSE.Results: The differences of the scores of MoCA and MMSE between CA group and control group were statistically significant( P 0. 01). The differences of the visual space and memory and reaction abilities in two groups were statistically significant( P 0. 01).Conclusions: The federated applications of MoCA and MMSE are beneficial to find the MCI patients with CA in the early stage. The memory and sensitivity of the impairment in local cognitive domain evaluated by MoCA are better than MMSE. MoCA can provide an evidence for early finding,preventing and treating the cognitive impairment in patients with CA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".