Therapy of atlantoaxial rotatory subluxaion and application of improved Halifax interlaminar clamps
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To summarize the experience in diagnosis and therapy of atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation.Methods:Twenty-five patients with atlantoaxial rotatory subluxtion were reviewed,who were treated in our department form 1999 to 2001.Clinical status and process of therapy were studied.The pertinent literatures was refer to discuss the progress in therapy of atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation.Result:25 patients with Fielding type Ⅰ?Ⅱ of atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation were cured by conservative therapy.Two patients with Fielding type Ⅲ who were failure by conservative therapy required posterior atlantoaxial arthrodesis and were treated with improved Halifax interlaminar clamps and had gotten satisfied clinical outcome.Conclusion:Atlantoaxial rotatory subluxaion are often found in children.The key of therapy was treated in earlier period and conservative therapy is the chief therapeutics.If it is failure,atlantoaxial arthrodesis is requiring and Halifax laminal clamps is safe effective and suiatble for atlantoaxial arthrodesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".