MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2365771718

MEASUREMENTS FOR SPATIAL ACCESSIBILITY OF NATIONAL FOREST PARKS IN CHINA

2013· article· en· W2365771718 on OpenAlex
Pan Jing-h

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChangjiang liuyu ziyuan yu huanjing · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyRaster dataTourismBeijingChinaProsperitySpatial analysisEnvironmental resource managementSustainable developmentDistribution (mathematics)National forestEcotourismCommon spatial patternRaster graphicsEcologyRemote sensingForestryEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEconomic growth
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low carbon economy,sustainable development and employment problems have been the focus of world attention.With the prosperity of ecotourism,the forest park in China gets its all-around development.Forest park has been a leading role in the development of forest tourism industry.Through the development of forest tourism in forest park,people's awareness of ecological protection was improved,and economic development in the surrounding was promoted,which has an increasingly important role in promoting regional economic development.The study of the spatial structure of forest park is receiving increasing attention but methodology so far has used qualitative rather than quantitative methods.The change of accessibility plays a prominent role of motive force to promote the regional economic development and regional spatial structure changes.Evaluation of accessibility generally includes network analysis,grid analysis and raster analysis.Based on an investigation of 713National Forest Parks and using GIS and some quantitative analysis methods,such as Nearest Neighbor Index(NNI)and Hot spot clustering,the spatial structure of National Forest Parks was investigated,and their characteristics and distribution for different strategies were discussed.Based on matrix raster data covering the whole space,this paper calculated spatial accessibility of all counties in China using cost weighted distance method and ArcGIS as platforms.Then spatial differences of county accessibility of scenic spots were discussed by using ESDA(Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis).The results show that general National Forest Parks exhibited an aggregated distribution.Considering the accessibility,we find that the human scenic spots were more centralized.The average accessibility was about 60.5min,and the area where the accessibility of scenic spots was within 2hreached 63.29%,while the area where the accessibility was within 30minutes accounted for 19.84% and the area located at central Tibetan Plateau took the longest time 595min.The average accessibility was shortened from 168.18min in 1991to 137.86min in 2010.And then,distribution of the accessibility pointed to traffic line.At county level,the estimated values of Moran's I were all positive numbers using analysis of spatial association.All the test results indicate that National Forest Park and adjacent areas showed positive correlation.Distribution of hot spots regarding the accessibility showed an obvious hot spots–sub-hotspots– sub-cold spots-cold spots zonal distribution pattern from east to west.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it