MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2365997556

Biorefinery:A New Revolution in Green Energy

2008· article· en· W2365997556 on OpenAlex
Yonghao Ni

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChina Pulp & Paper · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiorefineryPulp (tooth)EngineeringBiomass (ecology)Waste managementBiochemical engineeringPulp and paper industryBiofuel
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biorefinery,as a brand-new research area has gained much attention all over the world.A biorefinery is a facility that integrates biomass conversion processes and equipment to produce fuels,power,and chemicals from biomass.Biorefinery concept is built on two platforms:sugar platformandsyngas platform,and is regarded as the most potential bio-industry.The pulp and paper industry which has the infrastructure and experience in managing and processing large amount of biomass is in a unique position to be evolved into Integrated Forest Biorefinery(IFBR)that produces high value-added products such as ethanol,polymers,special chemicals,in addition to the traditional pulp and paper products.This paper reviewed current state of research in biorefinery,especial on the development of the key technologies in lignocellulosic ethanol.Some practical models of pulp and paper integrated biorefinery were discussed.The paper also introduced our current biorefinery project in cooperation with AV Nackawic,FPInnovations-Paprican and NBCC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it