MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2366064846

The influence of environment and time on the flammable liquid smoke sediment

2012· article· en· W2366064846 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFire Science and Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire Detection and Safety Systems
Canadian institutionsApotex Pharmachem (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlammable liquidCombustionSmokeComponent (thermodynamics)Environmental scienceSedimentGasolineDuration (music)Waste managementEnvironmental engineeringPetroleum engineeringEngineeringGeologyChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A combustion collection device was designed,to simulate the flammable liquid combustion smoke spreading and sediment in fire scene.Smoke was produced in the device,and collected in parallel and quantitatively.After being placed in different durations and temperatures,GC/MS was used to perform the component analysis,to decide if the sediment varies with time.Results showed that the component does not vary with gasoline types very much,but the quantity and combustion duration will affect it;the proportion of each component differs a lot with the sampling location;water doesn't affect the component;the component changes more while the duration gets longer and temperature gets higher.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.367
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it