MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2366097431

Application of ISOMAP for Cluster Analyses Of Chinese Documents

2009· article· en· W2366097431 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kexin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsomapComputer scienceCurse of dimensionalityDimensionality reductionCluster analysisEuclidean distanceGeodesicNonlinear dimensionality reductionPattern recognition (psychology)Hierarchical clusteringVisualizationArtificial intelligenceCluster (spacecraft)Feature vectorFeature (linguistics)Clustering high-dimensional dataHigh dimensionalData miningMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In text clustering procedure,it's very dimcult to evaluatc the statistical characteristics of samples because of the high dimensions,so effective dimensionality reduction is quite necessary. ISOMAP is a popular recent approach to nonlinear dimensionality reduetion method,it can reduce dimensionality effectively,this method improved the distance measurement between samples by replacing the classical Euclidean distance with the geodesic distance,then mapped text feature data from high-dimensional space into low-dimensional space(2 or 3 dimensions),therefore dimensionality was reduced,visualization for high-dimensional text feature data was realized,and a proper cluster number was obtained. At last,the experiment shows the validity of this method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.009
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocomputer applicationsSame topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207