MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2366133663 · doi:10.3138/cjh.ach.51.1.006

Southern Cuisine and the Future of Food History

2016· article· en· W2366133663 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of History · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCulinary Culture and Tourism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoodwaysChapelAllianceScholarshipPower (physics)HistoryArt historyEthnologySociologyAnthropologyArchaeologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Edible South: The Power of Food and the Making of an American Region, by Marcie Cohen Ferris. Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 2014. xiv, 477 pp. $35.00 US (cloth). Southern Provisions: The Creation and Revival of a Cuisine, by David S. Shields. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2015. xvi, 401 pp. $30.00 US (cloth). SOUTHERN FOOD IS HOT The Southern Cuisine--thanks to luminaries like Edna Lewis, Vivian Howard, Bill Neal, and Sean Brock--has captured the attention not only of Southern magazines like Southern Living and Garden and Gun but also the New York Times and PBS. The Southern Foodways Alliance fall symposia attract more than 400 participants, and tickets sell out weeks in advance. Southern-food lovers in Brooklyn, New York, have hundreds of restaurants from which to choose, and hipsters form out-the-door lines for humble fried-chicken sandwiches. There's a certain poignancy in this celebratory attention. Food is one of the few features of the US South that can be celebrated across class and racial lines. Cotton? Not so much. The Confederate flag? Nope. Bacon and greens? YES! In contrast to so much about the Southern Past, Southern food represents a heritage genuinely valued by whites and blacks (and Latinos and Asians and Africans) and rich and poor. The new attention from foodie elites has made Southern cuisine that much more valuable as a touchstone. In the last few years the scholarship on Southern food has begun to catch up. New books by Marcie Cohen Ferris and David S. Shields join the narrower or more idiosyncratic excellence of Sam Bowers Hilliard's Flog Meat and Hoecake: Food Supply in the Old South, 1840-1860 (Carbondale, 1972), Joe Gray Taylor's Eating, Drinking and Visiting in the South: An Informal History (Baton Rouge, 1982), John Egerton's Southern Food: At Home, on the Road, in History (New York, 1987), Elizabeth Engelhardt's A Mess of Greens: Southern Gender and Southern Food (Athens, 2011), Jessica B. Harris's High on the Hog: A Culinary journey from Africa to America (New York, 2011), Frederick Douglass Opie's Hog and Hominy: Soul Food from Africa to America (New York, 2008), and Jill Angela Cooley's To Live and Dine in Dixie: The Evolution of Urban Food Culture in the Jim Crow South (Athens, 2015). Readers of this journal may or may not be fans of Southern fried chicken, shrimp, or grits and may therefore find a plunge into the history of Southern food to be either tantalizing or gross. They are likely to also find it--at least as it is presented in these two books--to be somewhat disorienting. The task Ferris sets out for herself in The Edible South is actually less encompassing than the title suggests--it's not an encyclopedia of Southern cuisine nor quite the story of the creation of the South as a region. Still, Ferris's examination of what she calls the cultural conversation about Southern food across time is extraordinarily ambitious, travelling from the Atlantic Lowcountry to the Appalachian Mountains to the Mississippi Delta and covering the last five centuries. Divided into three chronological sections--the South up to Reconstruction (1870s), the New South (1880s-1940s), and the South since the Civil Rights movements of the 1950s--the book includes chapters on colonial explorers, Northern-born governesses, slave narratives, the Civil War, home economics, reform schools under Jim Crow, the New Deal, the marketing of Dixie in the early twentieth century, the restaurants of the Civil Rights era, the hunger tour of Senator Robert Kennedy in the 1960s, the Southern food counterculture, and the new Southern cuisine. The Edible South is a heavily laden table: a nineteen-course meal worthy of the planters and chefs she profiles. As such, there are some remarkably delightful dishes along the way. We learn of South Carolina's Lowcountry planter Eliza Lucas Pinckney's 1742 confession: I love the vegitable world extremely (25). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.013
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of History→Same topicCulinary Culture and Tourism→French-language works237,207→