MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2366177004

Undesirable SBM system efficiency evaluation methods based on non-separable variables

2015· article· en· W2366177004 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSystems engineering and electronics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEvaluation and Optimization Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeparable spaceBasis (linear algebra)Mathematical optimizationSensitivity (control systems)Computer scienceProduction (economics)Measure (data warehouse)Process (computing)MathematicsEngineeringData miningEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On the basis of slacks-based measure(SBM)model,firstly,divide the inputs,desirable outputs and undesirable outputs into separable and non-separable variables,build the undesirable SBM efficiency evaluation model based on non-separable variables to the complex production system.This model is more suitable to the actual production process of the production system.Then,on the basis of total regulation target of undesirable outputs,build the non-separable variables undesirable SBM model according to the perspective of regulation of undesirable outputs,this model measures the impact of regulation of undesirable outputs on the efficiency of the whole system.Finally,take 0.5as the step length,use an example to test the sensitivity of its impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it