Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To study the correlation between the presence and number of cerebral microbleeds(CMB)with cognitive function in cerebral small vessel disease(CSVD)patients without dementia.Methods Of the 156CSVD patients without dementia who underwent T2-weighted gradient echo MRI,28CMB positive patients served as a positive group and 28gender-,age-and education-matched CMB negative patients served as a control group.Their cognitive function was scored according to the MMSE and MoCA(Chinese version),respectively.Results The total MMSE and MoCA score were significantly lower while the incidence of brain white matter lesion and lacunar infarction was significantly higher in CMB positive group than in control group(P= 0.000,P=0.001).The CMB variants were negatively related with the the total MMSE and MoCA score,visuospatial and executive performance,calculation and attention(r=-0.778,P= 0.000;r=-0.783,P=0.000;r=-0.591,P=0.003;r=-0.539,P=0.008),and not related with naming(P=0.197),language(P=0.064),abstraction(P=0.288),memory(P=0.124), and orientation(P=0.157)when the gender,age,education years,white matter lesion and lacunar infarction were used as strain variants.Conclusion The number of CMB is related with vascular cognitive impairment(VCI)and CMB can thus be used as a biomarker in early diagnosis of VCI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it