Effect of Salt Stress on Germination of Four Kinds of Ornamental Plants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using Rudbeckia hirta,Coreopsis drummondii,Callistephus chinensis,Althaea rosea,four kinds of ornamental plant seeds as the test materials,treated with NaCl and Na2SO4 double salt solutions of different concentrations,and the relative germination percentage,root length,simply vigour index,synthetic inhibitory effect(SE) were measured to determine the effect of salt stress on seed germination.The result showed that the best is Coreopsis drummondii,its semi-lethal concentration and limit concentration both reached as high as 1.4%;The next was Callistephus chinensis,its semi-lethal concentration was 0.6%,and its limit concentration was 1.2%;The middle was Althaea rosea,its semi-lethal concentration was 0.4%,and its limit concentration was 1.2%;The lower one was Rudbeckia hirta,its semi-lethal concentration was 0.4%,and its limit concentration was 1.0%.The simply vigour index may be used to assess the level of the seed salt tolerance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".