MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2366533081

The Comprehensive Evaluation of the Ornamental Flower Plants Introduced from Canada by the Application of Hierarchy-relation Analysis

2009· article· en· W2366533081 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Niu Lixin

Bibliographic record

VenueXibei nongye xuebao · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptabilityOrnamental plantImpatiensLandscapingGeographyBiologyBotanyCultivarEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eighteen species of herbaceous flowers which were introduced from Canada were cultivated in Guanzhong plain of Shaanxi.The method of hierarchy-relation analysis of AHP in combination with grey relational grade theory were taken to do comprehensive evaluation based on the indicators of flower color,blooming period,flower aesthetics and drought resistance,cold tolerance,and so on.Analyzing results indicated that Lavatera trimestris,Papaver nudicaule,Impatiens sultanii and Campanula medium had low scores with poor adaptability;the other eight species flowers Anchusa azurea,Tithoniao tundifilia,Digitalis purpurea,Salvia farinacea which could adapt to the environment of Guanzhong plain had higher ornamental value and better adaptability,and they were worth to popularize in the areas around Shaanxi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueXibei nongye xuebaoSame topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207