MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2366540152

Study on Germination Characteristics of Pitaya Seeds

2007· article· en· W2366540152 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xie Shen-xi

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Research and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationBiologyHorticultureSignificant differenceBotanyMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seeds of three Pitaya strains Hylocereus polyrhizus (Weber) Britt. Rose,Hylocereus spp.and Hylocereus undatus Britt. Rose were used as the experimental materials to study the germination characteristics of Pitaya seeds.The results indicated that different genotype Pitaya strain seeds had different germination rate.The germination rate of Hylocereus undatus Britt. Rose was 93.3%,the highest among three Pitaya strain,but the seedlings did not come out evenly,and the germination energy only 16.0%.The difference of germination energy which is between the highest and the lowest germination of the different genotype Pitaya strain seeds is 57.3%,and the difference of germination index between the highest and the lowest is 45.79%.The result also improved that the seeds vigor of the Hylocereus spp.was the strongest,the Hylocereus polyrhizus(Weber) Britt. Rose took the second place,but the Hylocereus undatus Britt. Rose was the infirmest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicBotanical Research and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207