MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2366675303

Road Safety Guarantee Measures of Foreign Rural Roads

2010· article· en· W2366675303 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chen Jing-yun

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSafety and Risk Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnforcementTransport engineeringLegislationAuditBusinessOccupational safety and healthService (business)Speed limitRural areaOperations managementEngineeringMarketingMedicineAccountingPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to the literatures on rural road safety guarantees in US,Canada,UK and Australia,measures for rural road safety guarantee were analyzed with emphases on safety audit,engineering,education,enforcement,speed management,and emergency medical service.The analysis for rural road safety shows that(1) safety audit plays an important guide role in enhancements of rural road safety;(2) lower cost of engineering measures has an important influence on their acceptable range;(3) local governments and communities should participate in education;(4) legislation and enforcement is paid more and more attention;(5) the key of speed management is consistency between speed limit and road environment;(6)one effort on emergency medical service is to improve abilities of rural doctors and paramedical personnel as well as improve response to emergency call;(7) stable funding is a crucial basis for technical research,data collection,education and engineering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Highway and Transportation Research and DevelopmentSame topicSafety and Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207