Fractal Singular-Value (Egin-Value) Decomposition Method for Geophysical and Geochemical Anomaly Reconstruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Geochemical and geophysical anomalies are originated from geological processes. These processes involve a great deal of complexity temporally and spatially. It is critical to improve the current anomaly extraction methods from the standpoint of the association of geophysical and geochemical anomalies for mineral exploration. The fractal singular-value-decomposition (MSVD) in GIS environment developed in this study is demonstrated superb in extracting linear and circular geophysical and geochemical anomalies as well as the detailed structural and textural information from 2D geochemical and geophysical maps. The MSVD method constructs a self-contained orthogonal basis using the outer product of left and right eigenvector matrixes decomposed from 2D geochemical or geophysical maps. A power-law relationship based on fractal theory has been suggested to associate the spectrum density and spectrum radius (or spectrum scale) defined in the paper. Multiple power-law relationships observed between the spectrum density and spectrum radius can help to group singular values and their corresponding eigenvectors. Each of these groups can be used to reconstruct the geophysical and geochemical maps to reflect decomposed components. The component reconstructed with relative large singular values may correspond to background and those obtained with relatively small singular values may represent anomalies. This method has been demonstrated using datasets from Nova Scotia, Canada. The results obtained for As and other elements from lake sediment samples, gravity anomalies and airborne magnetic anomalies have shown that the power-law relationship might exist between spectrum density and spectrum radius. Several different exponents are observed from the datasets which can be based to separate the anomalies from background.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".