Mammals of the Córdoba Department of Colombia: history and conservation status
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A taxonomic list of the mammals recorded from the department of Córdoba is presented with data from reference collections of national and foreign museums. We include research results from research groups at the Unicórdoba Biodiversity research center (University of Cordoba) and the Functional Ecology Laboratory (UNESIS- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana). Databases of 13 museums in North America (MaNIS) were reviewed. Besides the records found in the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History (NMNH), Royal Ontario Museum (ROM), Texas Cooperative Wildlife Collection (TCWC) and USA Field Museum of Natural History (FMHN). Mammals of Córdoba department are represented by 40 families, 90 genera and 117 species. The greatest species richness of mammals was found in the subregions of upper Sinú and San Jorge. The greatest number of species are of the order Chiroptera (48.9 %), followed by Carnivora (12 %), Rodentia (10.3 %) and Cetacea (9.4 %).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".