MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2366741994

Modified epoxy with monodispersed solvent-free nano SiO_2 fluid

2014· article· en· W2366741994 on OpenAlexaff
Zheng Yapin

Bibliographic record

VenueFuhe cailiao xuebao · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEpoxy Resin Curing Processes
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpoxySolventMaterials scienceGlass transitionComposite materialEthylene glycolChemical engineeringPolymer chemistryChemistryOrganic chemistryPolymer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The solvent-free nano SiO2 fluid was prepared with nanoparticle SiO2 as the core,N,N-didecyl-N-methyl-N-(3-trimethoxysilylpropyl)ammonium chloride(SID3392)as the necklayer and poly(ethylene glycol)4-nonylphenyl3-sulfopropyl ether potassium salt(PEGS)as the canopy.The solvent-free nano SiO2 fluid is a Newtonian fluid with low viscosity at room temperature,and its viscosity is 4.3Pa·s at 26.5°C.The mass fraction of SiO2 in the solvent-free nano SiO2 fluid is 13.65%.The solvent-free nano SiO2 fluid is loaded in the epoxy matrix to prepare solvent-free nano SiO2fluid/epoxy composites.The TEM results confirm that the solvent-free nano SiO2 fluid disperses well in the epoxy matrix.DSC test shows that the solvent-free nano SiO2 fluid can decrease the curing temperature of the epoxy.When the content of solvent-free nano SiO2 fluid in the composites reaches up to 2.5wt%,the impact properties of the epoxy is improved up to 164.7%.The glass transition temperature is improved by 15.4℃.The SEM results of fracture surface also confirm that solvent-free nano SiO2 fluid can improve the toughness of epoxy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuhe cailiao xuebaoSame topicEpoxy Resin Curing ProcessesFrench-language works237,207