MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2366849134 · doi:10.4000/nda.3398

Le camp de détention de Spirit Lake en Abitibi (1915-1917) : d’une transformation du paysage à la colonisation du territoire

2016· article· fr· W2366849134 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christian Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Nouvelles de l archéologie · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtPolitical scienceHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’entrée en guerre du Canada, aux côtés des alliés britanniques, en août 1914, soulève rapidement la question des ressortissants de nationalité ennemie vivant au pays. Vingt-quatre camps de détention sont alors érigés à travers le Canada pour incarcérer prisonniers et suspects. S’élevant près de la ville d’Amos en Abitibi, le camp de Spirit Lake ouvre en janvier 1915 et devient l’un des plus importants, avec plus de 1 200 prisonniers et près de 150 femmes et enfants. Une intervention archéologique sur ce camp a été réalisée dans le cadre d’un projet de mise en valeur. Elle a permis d’en évaluer le potentiel patrimonial, de mieux comprendre l’organisation spatiale de ce vaste complexe carcéral et d’appréhender son rôle dans la transformation du paysage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Nouvelles de l archéologieSame topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207