MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2366869017

Experimental Study on Permeability of Compact Replacing Cohesive Soil in South-to-North Water Diversion Project

2010· article· en· W2366869017 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zou Rong-hua

Bibliographic record

VenueSubgrade Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeomechanics and Mining Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringPermeability (electromagnetism)CompactionGeologyWater diversionCompact spaceInfiltration (HVAC)EngineeringMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceMathematicsComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compact replacing cohesive soil is one of the methods for treatment of canal slope in swelling rock test section of the main canal(Luwangfen Section) in the first stage of the central line of South-to-North water diversion project,which has a higher requirement for permeability resistance.In-situ permeability test is carried out in rolling site with GUELPH infiltration meter.The result indicates that with 18t vibratory smooth-wheel roller,for different paving thickness,35cm has a better compaction;its compactness can reach 99.4% and permeability coefficient is 4.90×10-6cm/s at the 12th rolling.With different rolling machines,for paving thickness of 35cm,20t vibratory sheepfoot roller receives better compaction effect;its compactness can reach 97.2% and permeability coefficient is 4.89×10-6cm/s at the 10th rolling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSubgrade EngineeringSame topicGeomechanics and Mining EngineeringFrench-language works237,207