Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives:Comparing Chinese with Canadians in using coping humor;exploring the relationship between coping humor and mental health.Methods:354 university students filled out the Coping Humor Scale (CHS)and the Self-rated Symptom Check-List-90 questionnaire.Results:The Cronbach alpha of the CHS was 0.65 and its test-retest reliability with 74 university students was 0.79.The Cronbach alpha of the CHS by deleting item 4 increased to 0.70.The reliability and validity of the CHS by deleting item 4 were moderately acceptable.It is found that Chinese university male students used more coping humor in comparison with their female counterparts.Chinese university students used less coping humor than their Canadian counterparts.The CHS correlated negatively with the subscales and general symptomatic index of SCL-90.Conclusions:The CHS by deleting item 4 can be applied in the Chinese context,but further revision is also recommended.There are cultural differences in using coping humor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it