Characteristics Research on Chinese and International Excellent Female Half - pipe Snowboarders’Complete Motions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose is to find out the existing missdistance of completing motions between Chinese female half-pipe snowboarders and international excellent snowboarders,providing the theoretical reference for improving the snowboarders’competitive performance and competitive results.Methods: with the methods of documental information,expert interview and the complete motions has a quantitative and qualitative analysis of top 3 female snowboarders’designing routines,the using number of technical difficulty motions,parameters of completing motions,fluency of connection movements and placement selection at the 2010 ～ 2011 National Half-Pipe Snowboard complete motions and 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver.Results: in Chinese female snowboarders’routines,compared with international female excellent snowboarders,single motion difficulty,the number of difficulty motions,parameters of completing motions,fluency of connection movements and placement selection are significantly lower.Conclusions: Chinese female half-pipe snowboarders and international excellent snowboarders’qualities and difficulties of complete motions in competitions has a significant difference.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".