Analysis of Isozymes in Male Sterile line and Its Backcross Progenies of Alfalfa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By means of vertical slab polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis,perioxidase isozyme(POD)and esterase isozyme(EST)in male sterile line and its backcross progenies of Alfalfa were analyed. The results showed that, (1) The POD isozyme bands number of leaves of male sterile line and its backcross progenies in Alfalfa at budding period and flowering period are more than that at turning green period, the isozyme activity at turning green period is higher than that at budding period and flowering period. And the change law in the isozyme activity of EST is the same as that of POD. (2) At the different developing period of flowers,the isozyme activity of EST at green bud period is highest. The EST isozyme bands number of flowers is more than that of leaves, and the isozyme activity of EST of flowers that have bloomed are highest. The F,and BC, sterile plants have the characteristic POD and EST isozymes bands in MS-4. (3) The pattern of POD and EST isozymes of the sterile plants that were selected from backcross progenies is obviously similar to recurrent parent MS-4, which showed that some qualities of MS-4 has further appeared in backcross progenies. Therefore,we can identify that the sterility of MS-4 can inherit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".