MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2367179942

THE THERMODYNAMICS OF SUBSURFACE WARM WATER IN THE ARCTIC OCEAN

2010· article· en· W2367179942 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhi Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueHaiyang yu huzhao · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtmospheric sciencesSea iceStratification (seeds)ClimatologyEnvironmental scienceSea ice growth processesGeologyArctic ice packSea ice thickness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subsurface Warm Water (SWW) is a phenomenon frequently observed in the most part of Canadian basins, which presents a temperature peak under sea ice at the depth of 20 m. A thermodynamically coupled sea ice-upper ocean column model was developed in this paper to examine the thermodynamics of SWW. Using this model, the SWW was numerically simulated and proved successful. The result is consistent with the observed results. The mechanism of the SWW formation was proved able to generate by both solar radiation heating and surface cooling. It is verified that the solar radiation is the dominant energy source. Meanwhile, long-wave flux, air temperature, and atmospheric humidity play important roles in determining the relative intensity of SWW. As the solar energy would be obstructed from thick ice, SWW is formed on the areas of thin ice, leads, and still open water. The sumulation result of typical sharp peak of SWW agrees well with the observational ones. The variation was about 5.0×10-3 m2/s beneath the sea ice, and dropped sharply to 1.0×10?6 m2/s in subsurface layer, indicating that the peak of SWW was caused by the stratification of halocline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHaiyang yu huzhao→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→