MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2367243162

PCR Detection System for Genetically Modified Rice and Its Application in Genetic Breeding

2012· article· en· W2367243162 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiangyang Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicForest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in China
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenetically modified riceDetection limitBiologyGenetically modified organismDNA extractionPolymerase chain reactionGenetically modified cropsGeneTransgeneSelection (genetic algorithm)DNAExtraction (chemistry)BiotechnologyMolecular biologyGeneticsComputer scienceChromatographyChemistryArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A developed CTAB method and magnetic beads automatic extraction method were used to extract DNA from rice seed.Specific primers for PCR detection of genetically modified rice were designed to amplify endogenous SPS gene sequence and constructing specific segments,ThST 3 gene and Ubiquitin promoter,and corresponding detection methods were developed.Results of PCR amplification of SPS gene indicated that both the developed CTAB method and magnetic beads automatic extraction method were useful for DNA extraction from genetically modified rice seed and the sold rice seed.Results of amplification of the constructing specific segments(TheST 3-Ubi) indicated that the developed method was useful to detect the transgenic rice Theli seed,and the absolute and relative limit of detection(LOD) of the method got to 17.3×10-2ng and 0.41% respectively.The developed PCR method can detect transgenic rice Theli seed specially and detective sensitivity.And the method can satisfy the need of qualitative detection for genetically modified rice.Establishment of PCR Detection System can be used for marker-assisted selection(MAS) breeding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicForest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in ChinaFrench-language works237,207